From jacsib at lutecium.org Thu Oct 2 15:40:54 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques B. Siboni) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 15:40:54 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] test discard Message-ID: <5e6b72ea-b80c-49bc-a8a4-2e1d601d5047@lutecium.org> test discard From quinnfoerch at gmail.com Thu Oct 2 15:51:29 2025 From: quinnfoerch at gmail.com (Quinn Foerch) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 11:51:29 -0400 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Fwd: Tentative Times and Dates References: <767FC3BC-5BE6-4506-87A5-2853B607D965@gmail.com> Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From euripides.aviva at gmail.com Thu Oct 2 16:13:46 2025 From: euripides.aviva at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 09:13:46 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Fwd: Tentative Times and Dates In-Reply-To: References: <767FC3BC-5BE6-4506-87A5-2853B607D965@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi All, We are working on meeting Mon or Tues of next week around 6 pm PDT the following week-Scully Robert does this work for you? Aviva On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 8:54?AM Quinn Foerch wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wanted to forward this along in hopes that the mailing list is back > online. I had the meeting time wrong, so I was quite disappointed to have > missed it! Will we be having another meeting next week at the same time? > > Hope you all are excellent, talk soon, > Quinn > quinnfoerch.com > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From:* Quinn Foerch > *Date:* October 1, 2025 at 08:56:14 EDT > *To:* the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > *Cc:* kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com, Tate > *Subject:* *Re: [The-Lacanalyst] Tentative Times and Dates* > > ?Hi all, > > Whichever times are conducive to having the maximum amount of attendees > are those that I think we should aim for. We can always record these > sessions and transmit them, or create a private YouTube channel: the > options are endless. This mailing list adds a helpful dimension of > correspondence to keep the ideas we are working with consistent, in the > sense, of course, of a ?paper trail.? > > I find that what is most significant to propose as a ?next step? would be > the creation of some kind of document which asserts a few core tenets of > our praxis. While we are not in the business of generating ideological > prescriptions, it is important, I think, to carefully make a declaration of > our position. To me, this includes the necessity of self-authorization and > some justification for the cut?this ?cut? is precisely where we take on the > structural responsibility of the analytic discourse, and, therefore, a > vulnerable or amorphous place we have to define for legality?s sake. > > In any case, let us aim for some kind of maximum attendance with the > promise of communicating what we arrive at to those who cannot make this > session or another. I am grateful that we all are invested enough to try > and decide these things at a cost: a little risk is important here and > everywhere! > > With utmost appreciation, > Quinn > quinnfoerch.com > > On Sep 30, 2025, at 7:13?PM, Aviva Euripides > wrote: > > ? > Oh yikes > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 3:36?PM Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA via > The-lacanalyst wrote: > >> 6pm Pacific is 3am the next day in Paris... would Jacques be available? >> >> To visualize this: >> >> 6am - 12pm Pacific = 3pm - 9pm Paris >> >> 12pm - 6pm Pacific = 9pm - 3am Paris >> >> 6pm - 12am Pacific = 3am - 9am Paris >> >> 12am - 6am Pacific = 9am - 3pm Paris >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 1:52?PM Aviva Euripides < >> euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Oui this time works for me. >>> Thank you Scully Robert. >>> Jacques, John, Quinn, Kristopher? >>> >>> Quinn is on EDT-Quinn how late does or does not work for you in the pm >>> evenings weekdays? >>> >>> Aviva >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 1:31?PM Tate via The-lacanalyst < >>> the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Folks, >>>> >>>> I cannot meet this week since I will be just getting back from Europe >>>> and lagging. It will take me a moment >>>> also to contact all those interested at PLACE to see what times they >>>> are available. I would predict by >>>> next week or the week afterward that I could establish a date for the >>>> Zoom meeting. Wednesday nights >>>> so far seem to work as a first estimate, but again I need to contact >>>> others before confirming. >>>> >>>> In order to take into consideration the change of times between Europe >>>> and the US, would around >>>> 6:00pm or 7pm PST work? And would Wed or Tuesdays work as a proposal ( >>>> I cannot work on Fridays >>>> Thursdays, Saturdays, or Sundays). >>>> >>>> Until then, >>>> >>>> Scully Robert >>>> >>>> -- >>>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>>> >>> -- >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>> >> >> >> -- >> Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA >> *Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation.* >> Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC >> >> 1.206.451.7020 >> -- >> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From euripides.aviva at gmail.com Thu Oct 2 16:15:29 2025 From: euripides.aviva at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 09:15:29 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Fwd: Tentative Times and Dates In-Reply-To: References: <767FC3BC-5BE6-4506-87A5-2853B607D965@gmail.com>

Message-ID: Correction-that should read Tues or Wed. On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 9:13?AM Aviva Euripides wrote: > Hi All, > We are working on meeting Mon or Tues of next week around 6 pm PDT the > following week-Scully Robert does this work for you? > Aviva > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 8:54?AM Quinn Foerch wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Just wanted to forward this along in hopes that the mailing list is back >> online. I had the meeting time wrong, so I was quite disappointed to have >> missed it! Will we be having another meeting next week at the same time? >> >> Hope you all are excellent, talk soon, >> Quinn >> quinnfoerch.com >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> *From:* Quinn Foerch >> *Date:* October 1, 2025 at 08:56:14 EDT >> *To:* the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> *Cc:* kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com, Tate >> *Subject:* *Re: [The-Lacanalyst] Tentative Times and Dates* >> >> ?Hi all, >> >> Whichever times are conducive to having the maximum amount of attendees >> are those that I think we should aim for. We can always record these >> sessions and transmit them, or create a private YouTube channel: the >> options are endless. This mailing list adds a helpful dimension of >> correspondence to keep the ideas we are working with consistent, in the >> sense, of course, of a ?paper trail.? >> >> I find that what is most significant to propose as a ?next step? would be >> the creation of some kind of document which asserts a few core tenets of >> our praxis. While we are not in the business of generating ideological >> prescriptions, it is important, I think, to carefully make a declaration of >> our position. To me, this includes the necessity of self-authorization and >> some justification for the cut?this ?cut? is precisely where we take on the >> structural responsibility of the analytic discourse, and, therefore, a >> vulnerable or amorphous place we have to define for legality?s sake. >> >> In any case, let us aim for some kind of maximum attendance with the >> promise of communicating what we arrive at to those who cannot make this >> session or another. I am grateful that we all are invested enough to try >> and decide these things at a cost: a little risk is important here and >> everywhere! >> >> With utmost appreciation, >> Quinn >> quinnfoerch.com >> >> On Sep 30, 2025, at 7:13?PM, Aviva Euripides >> wrote: >> >> ? >> Oh yikes >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 3:36?PM Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA via >> The-lacanalyst wrote: >> >>> 6pm Pacific is 3am the next day in Paris... would Jacques be available? >>> >>> To visualize this: >>> >>> 6am - 12pm Pacific = 3pm - 9pm Paris >>> >>> 12pm - 6pm Pacific = 9pm - 3am Paris >>> >>> 6pm - 12am Pacific = 3am - 9am Paris >>> >>> 12am - 6am Pacific = 9am - 3pm Paris >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 1:52?PM Aviva Euripides < >>> euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Oui this time works for me. >>>> Thank you Scully Robert. >>>> Jacques, John, Quinn, Kristopher? >>>> >>>> Quinn is on EDT-Quinn how late does or does not work for you in the pm >>>> evenings weekdays? >>>> >>>> Aviva >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 1:31?PM Tate via The-lacanalyst < >>>> the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Folks, >>>>> >>>>> I cannot meet this week since I will be just getting back from Europe >>>>> and lagging. It will take me a moment >>>>> also to contact all those interested at PLACE to see what times they >>>>> are available. I would predict by >>>>> next week or the week afterward that I could establish a date for the >>>>> Zoom meeting. Wednesday nights >>>>> so far seem to work as a first estimate, but again I need to contact >>>>> others before confirming. >>>>> >>>>> In order to take into consideration the change of times between Europe >>>>> and the US, would around >>>>> 6:00pm or 7pm PST work? And would Wed or Tuesdays work as a proposal ( >>>>> I cannot work on Fridays >>>>> Thursdays, Saturdays, or Sundays). >>>>> >>>>> Until then, >>>>> >>>>> Scully Robert >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>>>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>>>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA >>> *Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation.* >>> Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC >>> >>> 1.206.451.7020 >>> -- >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>> >> -- >> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> >> -- >> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tate at netwood.net Thu Oct 2 18:38:08 2025 From: tate at netwood.net (Tate) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 11:38:08 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Tentative Times and Dates In-Reply-To: References: <767FC3BC-5BE6-4506-87A5-2853B607D965@gmail.com>

Message-ID: <00E5E001-5312-4384-A352-2043BDA1B1F0@netwood.net> Dear Folks, My apologies for the delayed response, as it is taking a moment to readapt to the time zone and get information from those participating at PLACE on which times will work for a meeting on the title of the analyst. In order to be as inclusive as possible, considering the time difference between Europe and US, I have asked if people at PLACE can meet in the morning (9:30am?) instead of the evening, and whether this is possible Tuesday or Wednesday of next week. I will have a response on my end Friday night. If this is not a feasible window, please let me know. SRobert > On Oct 2, 2025, at 9:15?AM, Aviva Euripides wrote: > > Correction-that should read Tues or Wed. > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 9:13?AM Aviva Euripides wrote: > Hi All, > We are working on meeting Mon or Tues of next week around 6 pm PDT the following week-Scully Robert does this work for you? > Aviva > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 8:54?AM Quinn Foerch wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wanted to forward this along in hopes that the mailing list is back online. I had the meeting time wrong, so I was quite disappointed to have missed it! Will we be having another meeting next week at the same time? > > Hope you all are excellent, talk soon, > Quinn > quinnfoerch.com > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Quinn Foerch >> Date: October 1, 2025 at 08:56:14 EDT >> To: the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> Cc: kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com, Tate >> Subject: Re: [The-Lacanalyst] Tentative Times and Dates >> >> ?Hi all, >> >> Whichever times are conducive to having the maximum amount of attendees are those that I think we should aim for. We can always record these sessions and transmit them, or create a private YouTube channel: the options are endless. This mailing list adds a helpful dimension of correspondence to keep the ideas we are working with consistent, in the sense, of course, of a ?paper trail.? >> >> I find that what is most significant to propose as a ?next step? would be the creation of some kind of document which asserts a few core tenets of our praxis. While we are not in the business of generating ideological prescriptions, it is important, I think, to carefully make a declaration of our position. To me, this includes the necessity of self-authorization and some justification for the cut?this ?cut? is precisely where we take on the structural responsibility of the analytic discourse, and, therefore, a vulnerable or amorphous place we have to define for legality?s sake. >> >> In any case, let us aim for some kind of maximum attendance with the promise of communicating what we arrive at to those who cannot make this session or another. I am grateful that we all are invested enough to try and decide these things at a cost: a little risk is important here and everywhere! >> >> With utmost appreciation, >> Quinn >> quinnfoerch.com >> >>> On Sep 30, 2025, at 7:13?PM, Aviva Euripides wrote: >>> >>> ?Oh yikes >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 3:36?PM Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA via The-lacanalyst wrote: >>> 6pm Pacific is 3am the next day in Paris... would Jacques be available? >>> >>> To visualize this: >>> >>> 6am - 12pm Pacific = 3pm - 9pm Paris >>> >>> 12pm - 6pm Pacific = 9pm - 3am Paris >>> >>> 6pm - 12am Pacific = 3am - 9am Paris >>> >>> 12am - 6am Pacific = 9am - 3pm Paris >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 1:52?PM Aviva Euripides wrote: >>> Oui this time works for me. >>> Thank you Scully Robert. >>> Jacques, John, Quinn, Kristopher? >>> >>> Quinn is on EDT-Quinn how late does or does not work for you in the pm evenings weekdays? >>> >>> Aviva >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 1:31?PM Tate via The-lacanalyst wrote: >>> Dear Folks, >>> >>> I cannot meet this week since I will be just getting back from Europe and lagging. It will take me a moment >>> also to contact all those interested at PLACE to see what times they are available. I would predict by >>> next week or the week afterward that I could establish a date for the Zoom meeting. Wednesday nights >>> so far seem to work as a first estimate, but again I need to contact others before confirming. >>> >>> In order to take into consideration the change of times between Europe and the US, would around >>> 6:00pm or 7pm PST work? And would Wed or Tuesdays work as a proposal ( I cannot work on Fridays >>> Thursdays, Saturdays, or Sundays). >>> >>> Until then, >>> >>> Scully Robert >>> >>> -- >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>> -- >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA >>> Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation. >>> Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC >>> 1.206.451.7020 >>> -- >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>> -- >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst From euripides.aviva at gmail.com Thu Oct 2 18:49:36 2025 From: euripides.aviva at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 11:49:36 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Tentative Times and Dates In-Reply-To: <00E5E001-5312-4384-A352-2043BDA1B1F0@netwood.net> References: <767FC3BC-5BE6-4506-87A5-2853B607D965@gmail.com>

<00E5E001-5312-4384-A352-2043BDA1B1F0@netwood.net> Message-ID: Hi SRobert, I am able to meet at 9:30am Tues or Wed of next week. Jacques, John, Quinn, Kristopher? Aviva On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 11:40?AM Tate via The-lacanalyst < the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: > Dear Folks, > > My apologies for the delayed response, as it is taking a moment to readapt > to the time zone and get information > from those participating at PLACE on which times will work for a meeting > on the title of the analyst. > > In order to be as inclusive as possible, considering the time difference > between Europe and US, I have asked if people at PLACE > can meet in the morning (9:30am?) instead of the evening, and whether this > is possible Tuesday or Wednesday of next week. > I will have a response on my end Friday night. > > If this is not a feasible window, please let me know. > > SRobert > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2025, at 9:15?AM, Aviva Euripides > wrote: > > > > Correction-that should read Tues or Wed. > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 9:13?AM Aviva Euripides < > euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > We are working on meeting Mon or Tues of next week around 6 pm PDT the > following week-Scully Robert does this work for you? > > Aviva > > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 8:54?AM Quinn Foerch > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Just wanted to forward this along in hopes that the mailing list is back > online. I had the meeting time wrong, so I was quite disappointed to have > missed it! Will we be having another meeting next week at the same time? > > > > Hope you all are excellent, talk soon, > > Quinn > > quinnfoerch.com > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > >> From: Quinn Foerch > >> Date: October 1, 2025 at 08:56:14 EDT > >> To: the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > >> Cc: kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com, Tate > >> Subject: Re: [The-Lacanalyst] Tentative Times and Dates > >> > >> ?Hi all, > >> > >> Whichever times are conducive to having the maximum amount of attendees > are those that I think we should aim for. We can always record these > sessions and transmit them, or create a private YouTube channel: the > options are endless. This mailing list adds a helpful dimension of > correspondence to keep the ideas we are working with consistent, in the > sense, of course, of a ?paper trail.? > >> > >> I find that what is most significant to propose as a ?next step? would > be the creation of some kind of document which asserts a few core tenets of > our praxis. While we are not in the business of generating ideological > prescriptions, it is important, I think, to carefully make a declaration of > our position. To me, this includes the necessity of self-authorization and > some justification for the cut?this ?cut? is precisely where we take on the > structural responsibility of the analytic discourse, and, therefore, a > vulnerable or amorphous place we have to define for legality?s sake. > >> > >> In any case, let us aim for some kind of maximum attendance with the > promise of communicating what we arrive at to those who cannot make this > session or another. I am grateful that we all are invested enough to try > and decide these things at a cost: a little risk is important here and > everywhere! > >> > >> With utmost appreciation, > >> Quinn > >> quinnfoerch.com > >> > >>> On Sep 30, 2025, at 7:13?PM, Aviva Euripides < > euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> ?Oh yikes > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 3:36?PM Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA via > The-lacanalyst wrote: > >>> 6pm Pacific is 3am the next day in Paris... would Jacques be available? > >>> > >>> To visualize this: > >>> > >>> 6am - 12pm Pacific = 3pm - 9pm Paris > >>> > >>> 12pm - 6pm Pacific = 9pm - 3am Paris > >>> > >>> 6pm - 12am Pacific = 3am - 9am Paris > >>> > >>> 12am - 6am Pacific = 9am - 3pm Paris > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 1:52?PM Aviva Euripides < > euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Oui this time works for me. > >>> Thank you Scully Robert. > >>> Jacques, John, Quinn, Kristopher? > >>> > >>> Quinn is on EDT-Quinn how late does or does not work for you in the pm > evenings weekdays? > >>> > >>> Aviva > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 1:31?PM Tate via The-lacanalyst < > the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: > >>> Dear Folks, > >>> > >>> I cannot meet this week since I will be just getting back from Europe > and lagging. It will take me a moment > >>> also to contact all those interested at PLACE to see what times they > are available. I would predict by > >>> next week or the week afterward that I could establish a date for the > Zoom meeting. Wednesday nights > >>> so far seem to work as a first estimate, but again I need to contact > others before confirming. > >>> > >>> In order to take into consideration the change of times between Europe > and the US, would around > >>> 6:00pm or 7pm PST work? And would Wed or Tuesdays work as a proposal ( > I cannot work on Fridays > >>> Thursdays, Saturdays, or Sundays). > >>> > >>> Until then, > >>> > >>> Scully Robert > >>> > >>> -- > >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list > >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > >>> -- > >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list > >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA > >>> Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation. > >>> Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC > >>> 1.206.451.7020 > >>> -- > >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list > >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > >>> -- > >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list > >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > > -- > > The-lacanalyst mailing list > > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > > -- > > The-lacanalyst mailing list > > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com Thu Oct 2 19:17:18 2025 From: kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com (Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 12:17:18 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Tentative Times and Dates In-Reply-To: References: <767FC3BC-5BE6-4506-87A5-2853B607D965@gmail.com>

<00E5E001-5312-4384-A352-2043BDA1B1F0@netwood.net> Message-ID: Hi everybody, I start clients at 9am on Wednesdays (I am available before 9am on Wednesday mornings) I can do 9:30am - 11am on the 2nd and 4thTuesday of each month, starting on 10/14 [10/28, 11/11, 11/25, ...]. So - I wouldn't be able to make it to the meeting next week, but I am available as above for more on-going attendance (within these parameters). Thanks. Kristopher On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 11:50?AM Aviva Euripides wrote: > Hi SRobert, > I am able to meet at 9:30am Tues or Wed of next week. > Jacques, John, Quinn, Kristopher? > Aviva > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 11:40?AM Tate via The-lacanalyst < > the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: > >> Dear Folks, >> >> My apologies for the delayed response, as it is taking a moment to >> readapt to the time zone and get information >> from those participating at PLACE on which times will work for a meeting >> on the title of the analyst. >> >> In order to be as inclusive as possible, considering the time difference >> between Europe and US, I have asked if people at PLACE >> can meet in the morning (9:30am?) instead of the evening, and whether >> this is possible Tuesday or Wednesday of next week. >> I will have a response on my end Friday night. >> >> If this is not a feasible window, please let me know. >> >> SRobert >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 2, 2025, at 9:15?AM, Aviva Euripides >> wrote: >> > >> > Correction-that should read Tues or Wed. >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 9:13?AM Aviva Euripides < >> euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > We are working on meeting Mon or Tues of next week around 6 pm PDT the >> following week-Scully Robert does this work for you? >> > Aviva >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 8:54?AM Quinn Foerch >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Just wanted to forward this along in hopes that the mailing list is >> back online. I had the meeting time wrong, so I was quite disappointed to >> have missed it! Will we be having another meeting next week at the same >> time? >> > >> > Hope you all are excellent, talk soon, >> > Quinn >> > quinnfoerch.com >> > >> > Begin forwarded message: >> > >> >> From: Quinn Foerch >> >> Date: October 1, 2025 at 08:56:14 EDT >> >> To: the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> >> Cc: kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com, Tate >> >> Subject: Re: [The-Lacanalyst] Tentative Times and Dates >> >> >> >> ?Hi all, >> >> >> >> Whichever times are conducive to having the maximum amount of >> attendees are those that I think we should aim for. We can always record >> these sessions and transmit them, or create a private YouTube channel: the >> options are endless. This mailing list adds a helpful dimension of >> correspondence to keep the ideas we are working with consistent, in the >> sense, of course, of a ?paper trail.? >> >> >> >> I find that what is most significant to propose as a ?next step? would >> be the creation of some kind of document which asserts a few core tenets of >> our praxis. While we are not in the business of generating ideological >> prescriptions, it is important, I think, to carefully make a declaration of >> our position. To me, this includes the necessity of self-authorization and >> some justification for the cut?this ?cut? is precisely where we take on the >> structural responsibility of the analytic discourse, and, therefore, a >> vulnerable or amorphous place we have to define for legality?s sake. >> >> >> >> In any case, let us aim for some kind of maximum attendance with the >> promise of communicating what we arrive at to those who cannot make this >> session or another. I am grateful that we all are invested enough to try >> and decide these things at a cost: a little risk is important here and >> everywhere! >> >> >> >> With utmost appreciation, >> >> Quinn >> >> quinnfoerch.com >> >> >> >>> On Sep 30, 2025, at 7:13?PM, Aviva Euripides < >> euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> ?Oh yikes >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 3:36?PM Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA via >> The-lacanalyst wrote: >> >>> 6pm Pacific is 3am the next day in Paris... would Jacques be >> available? >> >>> >> >>> To visualize this: >> >>> >> >>> 6am - 12pm Pacific = 3pm - 9pm Paris >> >>> >> >>> 12pm - 6pm Pacific = 9pm - 3am Paris >> >>> >> >>> 6pm - 12am Pacific = 3am - 9am Paris >> >>> >> >>> 12am - 6am Pacific = 9am - 3pm Paris >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 1:52?PM Aviva Euripides < >> euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Oui this time works for me. >> >>> Thank you Scully Robert. >> >>> Jacques, John, Quinn, Kristopher? >> >>> >> >>> Quinn is on EDT-Quinn how late does or does not work for you in the >> pm evenings weekdays? >> >>> >> >>> Aviva >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 1:31?PM Tate via The-lacanalyst < >> the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: >> >>> Dear Folks, >> >>> >> >>> I cannot meet this week since I will be just getting back from Europe >> and lagging. It will take me a moment >> >>> also to contact all those interested at PLACE to see what times they >> are available. I would predict by >> >>> next week or the week afterward that I could establish a date for the >> Zoom meeting. Wednesday nights >> >>> so far seem to work as a first estimate, but again I need to contact >> others before confirming. >> >>> >> >>> In order to take into consideration the change of times between >> Europe and the US, would around >> >>> 6:00pm or 7pm PST work? And would Wed or Tuesdays work as a proposal >> ( I cannot work on Fridays >> >>> Thursdays, Saturdays, or Sundays). >> >>> >> >>> Until then, >> >>> >> >>> Scully Robert >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> >>> -- >> >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA >> >>> Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation. >> >>> Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC >> >>> 1.206.451.7020 >> >>> -- >> >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> >>> -- >> >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> > -- >> > The-lacanalyst mailing list >> > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> > -- >> > The-lacanalyst mailing list >> > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> >> >> -- >> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -- Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA *Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation.* Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC 1.206.451.7020 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jacsib at lutecium.org Tue Oct 7 07:34:20 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques B. Siboni) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 07:34:20 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Hopefully!? Message-ID: <1674ea89-271d-452e-973d-270ed669825d@lutecium.org> Dear friends There has been many problems with the maintenance of the mailman mailing lists I am not absolutely sure it's running fine. Let's try it by finding a date for a future common meeting, thanks for making suggestions Jacques From jacsib at lutecium.org Tue Oct 7 10:00:31 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques B. Siboni) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 10:00:31 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] mails delivered Message-ID: <83131efd-456a-47cd-9b55-93ae6f5f1ef9@lutecium.org> The previous mails have been delivered (I presume but the archives were not updated so a new test J From tate at netwood.net Tue Oct 7 17:16:05 2025 From: tate at netwood.net (Tate) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 10:16:05 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Hopefully!? In-Reply-To: <1674ea89-271d-452e-973d-270ed669825d@lutecium.org> References: <1674ea89-271d-452e-973d-270ed669825d@lutecium.org> Message-ID: <5BABAE49-2F64-4E91-9209-B7B8FB75E14B@netwood.net> Hello Jacques and those on the list, Understood, I will assume this goes through and will consider the discussion for the Lacanalyst to be held for another time. Until then, SRobert > On Oct 7, 2025, at 12:34?AM, Jacques B. Siboni via The-lacanalyst wrote: > > Dear friends > > There has been many problems with the maintenance of the mailman mailing lists > I am not absolutely sure it's running fine. > > Let's try it by finding a date for a future common meeting, > thanks for making suggestions > > Jacques > > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst From euripides.aviva at gmail.com Tue Oct 7 17:20:05 2025 From: euripides.aviva at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 10:20:05 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Hopefully!? In-Reply-To: <5BABAE49-2F64-4E91-9209-B7B8FB75E14B@netwood.net> References: <1674ea89-271d-452e-973d-270ed669825d@lutecium.org> <5BABAE49-2F64-4E91-9209-B7B8FB75E14B@netwood.net> Message-ID: Hi All, Who can meet tomorrow 8 am PDT? Aviva On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 10:16?AM Tate via The-lacanalyst < the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: > Hello Jacques and those on the list, > > Understood, I will assume this goes through and will consider the > discussion for the Lacanalyst to > be held for another time. > > Until then, > > SRobert > > > > On Oct 7, 2025, at 12:34?AM, Jacques B. Siboni via The-lacanalyst < > the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: > > > > Dear friends > > > > There has been many problems with the maintenance of the mailman mailing > lists > > I am not absolutely sure it's running fine. > > > > Let's try it by finding a date for a future common meeting, > > thanks for making suggestions > > > > Jacques > > > > > > -- > > The-lacanalyst mailing list > > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From euripides.aviva at gmail.com Tue Oct 7 17:21:54 2025 From: euripides.aviva at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 10:21:54 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Hopefully!? In-Reply-To: References: <1674ea89-271d-452e-973d-270ed669825d@lutecium.org> <5BABAE49-2F64-4E91-9209-B7B8FB75E14B@netwood.net> Message-ID: Also, who can meet the following week 10/15 at 7 am PDT? I assume Jacques, John, Aviva and Quinn? On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 10:20?AM Aviva Euripides wrote: > Hi All, > Who can meet tomorrow 8 am PDT? > Aviva > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 10:16?AM Tate via The-lacanalyst < > the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: > >> Hello Jacques and those on the list, >> >> Understood, I will assume this goes through and will consider the >> discussion for the Lacanalyst to >> be held for another time. >> >> Until then, >> >> SRobert >> >> >> > On Oct 7, 2025, at 12:34?AM, Jacques B. Siboni via The-lacanalyst < >> the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: >> > >> > Dear friends >> > >> > There has been many problems with the maintenance of the mailman >> mailing lists >> > I am not absolutely sure it's running fine. >> > >> > Let's try it by finding a date for a future common meeting, >> > thanks for making suggestions >> > >> > Jacques >> > >> > >> > -- >> > The-lacanalyst mailing list >> > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> >> >> -- >> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jacsib at lutecium.org Wed Oct 8 15:10:28 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques B. Siboni) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 15:10:28 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Zoom? Message-ID: <75de823c-136b-479b-8710-6eab4588a3b1@lutecium.org> I thought we were starting a Zoom session at 1500 UTC today that is 8AM pacific, 17:00 Paris and 11AM Fl? Am I wrong? Jacques From euripides.aviva at gmail.com Wed Oct 8 15:24:55 2025 From: euripides.aviva at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 08:24:55 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Zoom? In-Reply-To: <75de823c-136b-479b-8710-6eab4588a3b1@lutecium.org> References: <75de823c-136b-479b-8710-6eab4588a3b1@lutecium.org> Message-ID: This meeting is for next Wednesday, 10/15 at 8 am. Attendees so far: You, me, RScully/PLACE, Quinn, Kristopher (until 9am). Hopefully John but not sure. On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 8:13?AM Jacques B. Siboni via The-lacanalyst < the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: > I thought we were starting a Zoom session at 1500 UTC today that is > 8AM pacific, 17:00 Paris and 11AM Fl? > > Am I wrong? > > Jacques > > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jacsib at lutecium.org Wed Oct 8 15:35:13 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques B. Siboni) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 15:35:13 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Zoom? In-Reply-To: References: <75de823c-136b-479b-8710-6eab4588a3b1@lutecium.org> Message-ID: <2526e337-005b-4722-bd47-6ce272f46530@lutecium.org> OK fine so till next week for the Zoom cartel J On 10/8/25 3:24 PM, Aviva Euripides wrote: > This meeting is for next Wednesday, 10/15 at 8 am. > Attendees so far: > You, me, RScully/PLACE, Quinn, Kristopher (until 9am). > Hopefully John but not sure. > > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 8:13?AM Jacques B. Siboni via The-lacanalyst > wrote: > > I thought we were starting a Zoom session at 1500 UTC today that is > 8AM pacific, 17:00 Paris and 11AM Fl? > > Am I wrong? > > Jacques > > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > > From avivaeuripides1 at gmail.com Wed Oct 8 15:46:34 2025 From: avivaeuripides1 at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 08:46:34 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Zoom? In-Reply-To: <2526e337-005b-4722-bd47-6ce272f46530@lutecium.org> References: <75de823c-136b-479b-8710-6eab4588a3b1@lutecium.org> <2526e337-005b-4722-bd47-6ce272f46530@lutecium.org> Message-ID: Oui *Aviva Euripides* LMFT, Topologos Lutecium 415-301-5219 avivaeuripides1 at gmail.com On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 8:39?AM Jacques B. Siboni via The-lacanalyst < the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: > OK fine so till next week for the Zoom cartel > > J > > On 10/8/25 3:24 PM, Aviva Euripides wrote: > > This meeting is for next Wednesday, 10/15 at 8 am. > > Attendees so far: > > You, me, RScully/PLACE, Quinn, Kristopher (until 9am). > > Hopefully John but not sure. > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 8:13?AM Jacques B. Siboni via The-lacanalyst > > wrote: > > > > I thought we were starting a Zoom session at 1500 UTC today that is > > 8AM pacific, 17:00 Paris and 11AM Fl? > > > > Am I wrong? > > > > Jacques > > > > > > -- > > The-lacanalyst mailing list > > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > > > > > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tate at netwood.net Tue Oct 14 01:05:27 2025 From: tate at netwood.net (Tate) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 18:05:27 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Link request for Zoom Message-ID: <08C7BCF5-305E-4C27-824B-6AA96D342148@netwood.net> Dear Folks, Would someone please forward me a Zoom passcode for this upcoming Wednesday, the 15th at 8:00 a.m. PST? Thanks, Scully Robert P.S. - if the list system is not working, I can be reached at > From jacsib at lutecium.org Tue Oct 14 09:50:54 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques B. Siboni) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:50:54 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Zoom meeting tomorrow Message-ID: <9553981c-a36b-400a-bf5c-0e54bc3653fc@lutecium.org> Dear friends Let me remind you the connection credentials for tomorrow: Date and time is Wednesday October 15 at 1500 UTC Paris 17:00 Pacific 08 AM FL 11 AM To the pleasure to talk together... Jacques Join Zoom Meeting https://us06web.zoom.us/j/4951270294?pwd=TUJNeVdJZm9scDFYakdWanVIZXVWZz09 Meeting ID: 495 127 0294 Passcode: QKsj5G One tap mobile +13092053325,,4951270294#,,,,*382952# US +13126266799,,4951270294#,,,,*382952# US (Chicago) Dial by your location +1 309 205 3325 US +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 360 209 5623 US +1 386 347 5053 US +1 507 473 4847 US +1 564 217 2000 US +1 646 931 3860 US +1 669 444 9171 US +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 689 278 1000 US +1 719 359 4580 US +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) +1 253 205 0468 US +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) +1 305 224 1968 US +33 1 7037 9729 France +33 1 7095 0103 France +33 1 7095 0350 France +33 1 8699 5831 France +33 1 7037 2246 France Meeting ID: 495 127 0294 Passcode: 382952 Find your local number:https://us06web.zoom.us/u/kc0gw3myxI From jacsib at lutecium.org Mon Oct 20 17:59:50 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques Siboni) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 17:59:50 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Another encounter... Message-ID: Dear friends I found this meeting very enlightening. We should fix another one when it's possible for all of us. And if we could decide of a series of themes it would be even better. If some of you know the email of persons who did attend but who are not in the mailing list, pls pass them to me. See you soon Jacques From tate at netwood.net Tue Oct 21 16:18:09 2025 From: tate at netwood.net (Tate) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 09:18:09 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Another encounter... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <69D0C87C-4C19-4FE9-A39C-D5CD130E1C64@netwood.net> Dear Folks, I'm not sure if this is being processed on the list, but I'll send out a test. If people would care to fix a date in the morning in the future, I can attend with others from PLACE (the word gets out slowly here, but there are now 6 people who can attend a future date). A series of themes? I have a few themes that I will only abbreviate here. 0) Is there a confirmation that the functioning of the title of psychoanalyst is not governed by state law ??? but the title of psychotherapy is? And that the latter is only relevant to those that claim to offer a service and diagnose people? And that analysis, as it does neither (or at least should not), does not fall under its jurisdiction? Taking this as settled, I propose the following themes get beyond this initial discussion. 1) How to organize an economy of analysis not based on services and goods (doing good for people), but truth and desire? What is a libidinal economy? 2) Why, how, is the division of work in an analytic association set up according to the transfer? (not academic, professional, or juridical measures) Why is the analytic transfer not the therapeutic transfer (onto a person)? How can there be an analytic transfer without any analysis? How can one confirm that analysis is taking place despite the personal analytic transfer? How do the preliminary meetings work? 3)The organization of the School/Clinic: why does the dominant liberal organization of psychoanalytic institutes, where personal analysis = talking cure, and formation = school of reading/writing, not work? What is Lacan?s critique of a certain liberal organization of psychoanalysis? (see Analysis and its Teaching, The Situation of Analysis, and The Freudian Thing). Are psychoanalytic schools simply the production of good listeners? What is the avoidance of writing in the private session? 4) The analyst as effect: the mistake of trying to be an analyst. Do analysts risk crazy in confusing it with psychotherapy? What is the real reason for high-premium insurance for psychotherapists in the U.S.? Is there a psychotherapeutic fear of analysis? Why is it important to include psychoanalysis in its own clinic of perversion, neurosis, psychosis? How to set up an association so that its conditions promote the act and transmission of analysis, not analysts and their patients? What is it to establish a libidinal economy of analysis? (See #1) ? Truly, SRGroome > On Oct 20, 2025, at 10:59?AM, Jacques Siboni via The-lacanalyst wrote: > > Dear friends > I found this meeting very enlightening. We should fix another one when it's possible for all of us. And if we could decide of a series of themes it would be even better. If some of you know the email of persons who did attend but who are not in the mailing list, pls pass them to me. > See you soon > Jacques > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jacsib at lutecium.org Tue Oct 21 16:54:48 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques Siboni) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 16:54:48 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Transfer or transference? Message-ID: Robert excellent themes... Now one question about the English translation of transfert. Some say transference and I noticed you say transfer. Can some of you enlighten me? Jacques From tate at netwood.net Tue Oct 21 17:43:46 2025 From: tate at netwood.net (Tate) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:43:46 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Transfer or transference? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9EBE1D2E-446C-4E37-B82B-CF30FA334CFB@netwood.net> Rebonjour Jacques, I think the German ?bertrangung is never defined precisely to the extent the ??ber? is left out, which would be more like Ur-Transfer in English. Thus, whether translated as transfer or transference in English, the tendency is to always confuse the transfer with its effects, as a projection onto the person, and not as a cause ? as ?bertrangung. In any case, this simple problem should be clarified not only in English but French. Second, I am not sure my posts are going through on the list again. I do not see my questions/themes registered on it. Let me know. Until then, SRobert ps - there are about 6-8 people at PLACE that are interested in this problem and have informed them of your list-serve in case they care to participate on it. > On Oct 21, 2025, at 9:54?AM, Jacques Siboni via The-lacanalyst wrote: > > Robert excellent themes... > Now one question about the English translation of transfert. Some say transference and I noticed you say transfer. Can some of you enlighten me? > Jacques > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst From tate at netwood.net Tue Oct 21 17:49:50 2025 From: tate at netwood.net (Tate) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:49:50 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Transfer or transference?/Correction In-Reply-To: <9EBE1D2E-446C-4E37-B82B-CF30FA334CFB@netwood.net> References: <9EBE1D2E-446C-4E37-B82B-CF30FA334CFB@netwood.net> Message-ID: Correction ? spelling mistake ??bertrangung? is misspelled, it should be ?bertragung? > On Oct 21, 2025, at 10:43?AM, Tate via The-lacanalyst wrote: > > Rebonjour Jacques, > > I think the German ?bertrangung is never defined precisely to the extent the ??ber? is left out, which would be more like Ur-Transfer in English. > Thus, whether translated as transfer or transference in English, the tendency is to always confuse the transfer with its effects, as a projection onto the person, and > not as a cause ? as ?bertrangung. In any case, this simple problem should be clarified not only in English but French. > > Second, I am not sure my posts are going through on the list again. I do not see my questions/themes registered on it. Let me know. > > Until then, > > SRobert > > ps - there are about 6-8 people at PLACE that are interested in this problem and have informed them of your list-serve in case they care to participate on it. > >> On Oct 21, 2025, at 9:54?AM, Jacques Siboni via The-lacanalyst wrote: >> >> Robert excellent themes... >> Now one question about the English translation of transfert. Some say transference and I noticed you say transfer. Can some of you enlighten me? >> Jacques >> >> -- >> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst From jacsib at lutecium.org Thu Oct 23 07:00:04 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques Siboni) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 07:00:04 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Are mails delivered? Message-ID: <35728471-712a-444a-ade7-07812fc9749d@lutecium.org> Dear Robert It seems the mails go through. There is a problem I could not solve, it seems pretty difficult to receive a copy of one's own mail. I could not solve this. But if you want to make sure it was delivered check the archives, BUT there is delay of a few hours for the archives to be updated! https://www.lutecium.org/pipermail/the-lacanalyst/ Jacques From jacsib at lutecium.org Sat Oct 25 13:16:46 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques Siboni) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 13:16:46 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Try to fix a date Message-ID: Dear friends We have not chosen a date, can we do it now. But we have to take into account that if our next meeting is within next week there is going to be a particular difference in time zones You quit summer times next week in America and we do the week after in Europe (Nov 2) Please make offers and we'll see, (for me in France the week to come I'm still on vacations so pretty available) very best Jacques From jacsib at lutecium.org Sat Oct 25 21:01:33 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques Siboni) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 21:01:33 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Wrong dates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <24AC5323-C636-4024-BEB2-ED8260987E11@lutecium.org> I was wrong Europe is changing time this Sunday and America the next one Nov 2 Sorry Jacques On October 25, 2025 1:16:46 PM UTC, Jacques Siboni wrote: >Dear friends > >We have not chosen a date, can we do it now. But we have to take into account that if >our next meeting is within next week there is going to be a particular difference in time zones >You quit summer times next week in America and we do the week after in Europe (Nov 2) >Please make offers and we'll see, (for me in France the week to come I'm still on vacations >so pretty available) > >very best > >Jacques > From avivaeuripides1 at gmail.com Sun Oct 26 18:15:39 2025 From: avivaeuripides1 at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:15:39 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Try to fix a date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Bonjour Jacques, Best time for me is 6 am but I will make it work when others can. Aviva *Aviva Euripides* LMFT, Topologos Lutecium 415-301-5219 avivaeuripides1 at gmail.com On Sat, Oct 25, 2025 at 6:20?AM Jacques Siboni via The-lacanalyst < the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: > Dear friends > > We have not chosen a date, can we do it now. But we have to take into > account that if > our next meeting is within next week there is going to be a particular > difference in time zones > You quit summer times next week in America and we do the week after in > Europe (Nov 2) > Please make offers and we'll see, (for me in France the week to come I'm > still on vacations > so pretty available) > > very best > > Jacques > > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tate at netwood.net Sun Oct 26 20:04:33 2025 From: tate at netwood.net (Tate) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:04:33 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Wrong dates In-Reply-To: <24AC5323-C636-4024-BEB2-ED8260987E11@lutecium.org> References: <24AC5323-C636-4024-BEB2-ED8260987E11@lutecium.org> Message-ID: Dear Folks, If people at Lutecium care to set a date and time during the week between 6:00am ? 8:00am PST, preferably Wed., myself and others from PLACE will be able to attend. A week in advance notice would be great. To you, SRobert > On Oct 25, 2025, at 2:01?PM, Jacques Siboni via The-lacanalyst wrote: > > I was wrong Europe is changing time this Sunday and America the next one Nov 2 > Sorry > Jacques > > On October 25, 2025 1:16:46 PM UTC, Jacques Siboni wrote: >> Dear friends >> >> We have not chosen a date, can we do it now. But we have to take into account that if >> our next meeting is within next week there is going to be a particular difference in time zones >> You quit summer times next week in America and we do the week after in Europe (Nov 2) >> Please make offers and we'll see, (for me in France the week to come I'm still on vacations >> so pretty available) >> >> very best >> >> Jacques >> > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst From jacsib at lutecium.org Mon Oct 27 14:25:57 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques Siboni) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:25:57 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Next meeting Message-ID: <8b76fcdd-3b36-4acc-950b-d03f75bc3da0@lutecium.org> Could it be possible Wednesday Nov 6 at 6AM PDT 1400 UTC? But I'll have to leave just after one hour? Or Wednesday Oct 29 7AM PST that's 1400 UTC? (not limited to one hour) Jacques From euripides.aviva at gmail.com Mon Oct 27 14:59:46 2025 From: euripides.aviva at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 07:59:46 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Next meeting In-Reply-To: <8b76fcdd-3b36-4acc-950b-d03f75bc3da0@lutecium.org> References: <8b76fcdd-3b36-4acc-950b-d03f75bc3da0@lutecium.org> Message-ID: Yes for me. On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 7:28?AM Jacques Siboni via The-lacanalyst < the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: > Could it be possible Wednesday Nov 6 at 6AM PDT 1400 UTC? But I'll have > to leave > just after one hour? > > Or Wednesday Oct 29 7AM PST that's 1400 UTC? (not limited to one hour) > > Jacques > > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From quinnfoerch at gmail.com Mon Oct 27 15:06:21 2025 From: quinnfoerch at gmail.com (Quinn Foerch) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:06:21 -0400 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Next meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com Mon Oct 27 19:00:52 2025 From: kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com (Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 12:00:52 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Next meeting In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Hi Everybody - Jacques - November 6th is a Thursday. Did you mean Wednesday 11/5? Just double checking. Aviva and Quinn - which are you agreeing to: 10/29 at 7am Pacific or 11/5 (I assume Wednesday) at 6am Pacific? Thanks, Kristopher On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 8:07?AM Quinn Foerch wrote: > Hi all, > > I did not receive this email from the mailing list. Hopefully it is just a > glitch! That works for me also. > > Let me know, > Quinn > quinnfoerch.com > > On Oct 27, 2025, at 11:02, Aviva Euripides > wrote: > > ? > Yes for me. > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 7:28?AM Jacques Siboni via The-lacanalyst < > the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: > >> Could it be possible Wednesday Nov 6 at 6AM PDT 1400 UTC? But I'll have >> to leave >> just after one hour? >> >> Or Wednesday Oct 29 7AM PST that's 1400 UTC? (not limited to one hour) >> >> Jacques >> >> >> -- >> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -- Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA *Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation.* Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC 1.206.451.7020 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From euripides.aviva at gmail.com Mon Oct 27 22:33:12 2025 From: euripides.aviva at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:33:12 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Next meeting In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: 6 am Pacific for me. I am not sure if this will be too early for John though. On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 12:01?PM Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA via The-lacanalyst wrote: > Hi Everybody - > > Jacques - November 6th is a Thursday. Did you mean Wednesday 11/5? Just > double checking. > > Aviva and Quinn - which are you agreeing to: 10/29 at 7am Pacific or 11/5 > (I assume Wednesday) at 6am Pacific? > > Thanks, > Kristopher > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 8:07?AM Quinn Foerch > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I did not receive this email from the mailing list. Hopefully it is just >> a glitch! That works for me also. >> >> Let me know, >> Quinn >> quinnfoerch.com >> >> On Oct 27, 2025, at 11:02, Aviva Euripides >> wrote: >> >> ? >> Yes for me. >> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 7:28?AM Jacques Siboni via The-lacanalyst < >> the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: >> >>> Could it be possible Wednesday Nov 6 at 6AM PDT 1400 UTC? But I'll have >>> to leave >>> just after one hour? >>> >>> Or Wednesday Oct 29 7AM PST that's 1400 UTC? (not limited to one hour) >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> -- >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>> >> -- >> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> >> -- >> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> > > > -- > Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA > *Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation.* > Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC > > 1.206.451.7020 > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com Mon Oct 27 23:18:23 2025 From: kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com (Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:18:23 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Next meeting In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Thank you Aviva. 6am on *11/5* (Wednesday) works for me as well. Kristopher On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 3:33?PM Aviva Euripides wrote: > 6 am Pacific for me. > I am not sure if this will be too early for John though. > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 12:01?PM Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA via > The-lacanalyst wrote: > >> Hi Everybody - >> >> Jacques - November 6th is a Thursday. Did you mean Wednesday 11/5? Just >> double checking. >> >> Aviva and Quinn - which are you agreeing to: 10/29 at 7am Pacific or 11/5 >> (I assume Wednesday) at 6am Pacific? >> >> Thanks, >> Kristopher >> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 8:07?AM Quinn Foerch >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I did not receive this email from the mailing list. Hopefully it is just >>> a glitch! That works for me also. >>> >>> Let me know, >>> Quinn >>> quinnfoerch.com >>> >>> On Oct 27, 2025, at 11:02, Aviva Euripides >>> wrote: >>> >>> ? >>> Yes for me. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 7:28?AM Jacques Siboni via The-lacanalyst < >>> the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Could it be possible Wednesday Nov 6 at 6AM PDT 1400 UTC? But I'll have >>>> to leave >>>> just after one hour? >>>> >>>> Or Wednesday Oct 29 7AM PST that's 1400 UTC? (not limited to one hour) >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>>> >>> -- >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>> >>> -- >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>> >> >> >> -- >> Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA >> *Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation.* >> Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC >> >> 1.206.451.7020 >> -- >> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> > -- Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA *Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation.* Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC 1.206.451.7020 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gaspo at lmi.net Tue Oct 28 07:31:43 2025 From: gaspo at lmi.net (John Gasperoni) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:31:43 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Next meeting In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <329F589D-0967-4A31-9F8F-33663260B9F2@lmi.net> I?m glad a time and date were finally decided on. I?ll be present, such as that may be. Sent from my iPad > On Oct 27, 2025, at 4:18 PM, Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA via The-lacanalyst wrote: > > Thank you Aviva. 6am on 11/5 (Wednesday) works for me as well. > > Kristopher > >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 3:33?PM Aviva Euripides wrote: >> 6 am Pacific for me. >> I am not sure if this will be too early for John though. >> >>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 12:01?PM Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA via The-lacanalyst wrote: >>> Hi Everybody - >>> >>> Jacques - November 6th is a Thursday. Did you mean Wednesday 11/5? Just double checking. >>> >>> Aviva and Quinn - which are you agreeing to: 10/29 at 7am Pacific or 11/5 (I assume Wednesday) at 6am Pacific? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Kristopher >>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 8:07?AM Quinn Foerch wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I did not receive this email from the mailing list. Hopefully it is just a glitch! That works for me also. >>>> >>>> Let me know, >>>> Quinn >>>> quinnfoerch.com >>>> >>>>> On Oct 27, 2025, at 11:02, Aviva Euripides wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ? >>>>> Yes for me. >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 7:28?AM Jacques Siboni via The-lacanalyst wrote: >>>>>> Could it be possible Wednesday Nov 6 at 6AM PDT 1400 UTC? But I'll have >>>>>> to leave >>>>>> just after one hour? >>>>>> >>>>>> Or Wednesday Oct 29 7AM PST that's 1400 UTC? (not limited to one hour) >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>>>>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>>>>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>>>> -- >>>>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>>>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>>>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>>> -- >>>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA >>> Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation. >>> Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC >>> 1.206.451.7020 >>> -- >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > > > > -- > Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA > Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation. > Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC > 1.206.451.7020 > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tate at netwood.net Tue Oct 28 15:43:03 2025 From: tate at netwood.net (Tate) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:43:03 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Dates and Subject Message-ID: Dear Folks, I take it that the meeting on the Title of the Analyst will be on Wed. The 5th of Nov. at 6:00 am PST. And the topic? I sent out a set of topics previously (Another Encounter: 9.21.25) that no longer leaves the problem of determining such a title at a judicial, professional, or legislative level (Problem #0). Are there other problem topics than those I listed previously? Until then, SRobert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jacsib at lutecium.org Wed Oct 29 10:04:07 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques Siboni) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:04:07 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] I'll start a session... Message-ID: <91bf1cb7-b919-4962-8064-192f407f3ee1@lutecium.org> Dear friends If some of you are available today Wednesday, I'll open a session at 1400 UTC that is 3 PM Paris time and 7AM Pacific. If it is too short to be free next will be Nov 5 at 1400 UTC 6AM Pacific, 3PM Paris. If I am not wrong! Join Zoom Meeting https://us06web.zoom.us/j/4951270294?pwd=TUJNeVdJZm9scDFYakdWanVIZXVWZz09 Meeting ID: 495 127 0294 Passcode: QKsj5G One tap mobile +13092053325,,4951270294#,,,,*382952# US +13126266799,,4951270294#,,,,*382952# US (Chicago) Dial by your location ??????? +1 309 205 3325 US ??????? +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) ??????? +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) ??????? +1 360 209 5623 US ??????? +1 386 347 5053 US ??????? +1 507 473 4847 US ??????? +1 564 217 2000 US ??????? +1 646 931 3860 US ??????? +1 669 444 9171 US ??????? +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) ??????? +1 689 278 1000 US ??????? +1 719 359 4580 US ??????? +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) ??????? +1 253 205 0468 US ??????? +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) ??????? +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) ??????? +1 305 224 1968 US ??????? +33 1 7037 9729 France ??????? +33 1 7095 0103 France ??????? +33 1 7095 0350 France ??????? +33 1 8699 5831 France ??????? +33 1 7037 2246 France Meeting ID: 495 127 0294 Passcode: 382952 Find your local number:https://us06web.zoom.us/u/kc0gw3myxI All the best Jacques From tate at netwood.net Fri Oct 31 03:57:00 2025 From: tate at netwood.net (Tate) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:57:00 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Zoom Code for next Wed. In-Reply-To: <91bf1cb7-b919-4962-8064-192f407f3ee1@lutecium.org> References: <91bf1cb7-b919-4962-8064-192f407f3ee1@lutecium.org> Message-ID: Hello Jacques, The list serve seems to be working now and I am getting a return copy of what I post. It also seems my posts are showing up on the list, after a 4-5 hrs delay. I have notified people at PLACE of this list serve, but do you have the Zoom code for Wed. 6:00am PST the 5th of Nov.? Is it the same as the one below? Or? > On Oct 29, 2025, at 3:04?AM, Jacques Siboni via The-lacanalyst wrote: > > Join Zoom Meeting > https://us06web.zoom.us/j/4951270294?pwd=TUJNeVdJZm9scDFYakdWanVIZXVWZz09 Thanks, SRobert From jacsib at lutecium.org Thu Oct 2 15:40:54 2025 From: jacsib at lutecium.org (Jacques B. Siboni) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 15:40:54 +0000 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] test discard Message-ID: <5e6b72ea-b80c-49bc-a8a4-2e1d601d5047@lutecium.org> test discard From quinnfoerch at gmail.com Thu Oct 2 15:51:29 2025 From: quinnfoerch at gmail.com (Quinn Foerch) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 11:51:29 -0400 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Fwd: Tentative Times and Dates References: <767FC3BC-5BE6-4506-87A5-2853B607D965@gmail.com> Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From euripides.aviva at gmail.com Thu Oct 2 16:13:46 2025 From: euripides.aviva at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 09:13:46 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Fwd: Tentative Times and Dates In-Reply-To: References: <767FC3BC-5BE6-4506-87A5-2853B607D965@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi All, We are working on meeting Mon or Tues of next week around 6 pm PDT the following week-Scully Robert does this work for you? Aviva On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 8:54?AM Quinn Foerch wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wanted to forward this along in hopes that the mailing list is back > online. I had the meeting time wrong, so I was quite disappointed to have > missed it! Will we be having another meeting next week at the same time? > > Hope you all are excellent, talk soon, > Quinn > quinnfoerch.com > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From:* Quinn Foerch > *Date:* October 1, 2025 at 08:56:14 EDT > *To:* the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > *Cc:* kristopher at serendipityhealingarts.com, Tate > *Subject:* *Re: [The-Lacanalyst] Tentative Times and Dates* > > ?Hi all, > > Whichever times are conducive to having the maximum amount of attendees > are those that I think we should aim for. We can always record these > sessions and transmit them, or create a private YouTube channel: the > options are endless. This mailing list adds a helpful dimension of > correspondence to keep the ideas we are working with consistent, in the > sense, of course, of a ?paper trail.? > > I find that what is most significant to propose as a ?next step? would be > the creation of some kind of document which asserts a few core tenets of > our praxis. While we are not in the business of generating ideological > prescriptions, it is important, I think, to carefully make a declaration of > our position. To me, this includes the necessity of self-authorization and > some justification for the cut?this ?cut? is precisely where we take on the > structural responsibility of the analytic discourse, and, therefore, a > vulnerable or amorphous place we have to define for legality?s sake. > > In any case, let us aim for some kind of maximum attendance with the > promise of communicating what we arrive at to those who cannot make this > session or another. I am grateful that we all are invested enough to try > and decide these things at a cost: a little risk is important here and > everywhere! > > With utmost appreciation, > Quinn > quinnfoerch.com > > On Sep 30, 2025, at 7:13?PM, Aviva Euripides > wrote: > > ? > Oh yikes > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 3:36?PM Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA via > The-lacanalyst wrote: > >> 6pm Pacific is 3am the next day in Paris... would Jacques be available? >> >> To visualize this: >> >> 6am - 12pm Pacific = 3pm - 9pm Paris >> >> 12pm - 6pm Pacific = 9pm - 3am Paris >> >> 6pm - 12am Pacific = 3am - 9am Paris >> >> 12am - 6am Pacific = 9am - 3pm Paris >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 1:52?PM Aviva Euripides < >> euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Oui this time works for me. >>> Thank you Scully Robert. >>> Jacques, John, Quinn, Kristopher? >>> >>> Quinn is on EDT-Quinn how late does or does not work for you in the pm >>> evenings weekdays? >>> >>> Aviva >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 1:31?PM Tate via The-lacanalyst < >>> the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Folks, >>>> >>>> I cannot meet this week since I will be just getting back from Europe >>>> and lagging. It will take me a moment >>>> also to contact all those interested at PLACE to see what times they >>>> are available. I would predict by >>>> next week or the week afterward that I could establish a date for the >>>> Zoom meeting. Wednesday nights >>>> so far seem to work as a first estimate, but again I need to contact >>>> others before confirming. >>>> >>>> In order to take into consideration the change of times between Europe >>>> and the US, would around >>>> 6:00pm or 7pm PST work? And would Wed or Tuesdays work as a proposal ( >>>> I cannot work on Fridays >>>> Thursdays, Saturdays, or Sundays). >>>> >>>> Until then, >>>> >>>> Scully Robert >>>> >>>> -- >>>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>>> >>> -- >>> The-lacanalyst mailing list >>> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >>> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >>> >> >> >> -- >> Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA >> *Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation.* >> Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC >> >> 1.206.451.7020 >> -- >> The-lacanalyst mailing list >> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org >> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst >> > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > > -- > The-lacanalyst mailing list > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From euripides.aviva at gmail.com Thu Oct 2 16:15:29 2025 From: euripides.aviva at gmail.com (Aviva Euripides) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 09:15:29 -0700 Subject: [The-Lacanalyst] Fwd: Tentative Times and Dates In-Reply-To: References: <767FC3BC-5BE6-4506-87A5-2853B607D965@gmail.com>