How violence influences the construction of the young people of suburbs? The figure of the monster fascinates our company. This one takes in the exemplary media two forms: the pedophile and the terrorist. It is enough to light television to realize it. Those captivate the glance of the public. Sometimes I wonder, of my place of psychiatrist-psychoanalyst, if a ?young person of suburbs? will not come to lengthen this list soon. He occurs indeed, nowadays, a serious and remarkable phenomenon. Traditionally, the children represent for the adults what exists more invaluable. They incarnate the future and the dream of better following days. THe adults carry thus, by their glance and the desire that comes to this youth of which the ambitions resound with waiting and the confidence of the elder ones. However, for a few decades, a point of crack has appeared in this assembly necessary between the adults and youth. The play of mirror more systematically seems not to operate. The adults represent more and more the young people like potentially dangerous individuals. The media, whose matter reflects the opinion of most of the population, transform the echo of this change, which they feed readily. Does one measure sufficiently the consequences of such a reversal? ?The teenager of suburbs? became the paradigm of this process to work. He burns the cars, attacks the police force and, once become adult, comes to inflate the rows of the unemployed whom the company must nourish and look after, when it should not finance prisons to imprison the monster. At the bottom, which it is possible to decipher in the speech of the adults, it is the fear. AIn addition, there still, does one measure sufficiently what occurs when the adults start to be afraid of their children? What does it occur when in a family the fathers and the mothers are afraid of their sons and their girls? What can the parents thus fear at their offspring if it is not something of them? Which repercussion can one expect some on the children, on their subjective construction? Because, finally, of what do they need some ?young people suburbs? who worry so much the authorities with the approach of the date birthday of the events of last November? Moreover, how would it be possible to pacify the deer in freedom in elsewhere of these border areas of the large towns of France? The answer falls under the direction: these teenagers require that the adults trust them again and listen to what they have to say. They require that the adults trust them, quite simply because they are the wire and the girls of the adults of this country. Especially, they require that the adults make them feel this confidence and the hopes that they place in them. The best means to agitate a deer, it is to make him feel that one is afraid of him. And the best means of agitating a child or a teenager, was it of suburbs, it is to make him feel that the adult opposite is distressed and trembles in front of him; what does not fail to do the current Minister of Interior Department by reinforcing coercive measurements . Those are perpetually multiplying the projects of prevention against the delinquents in power that represents these young people in its eyes. What can hear the young people, between the lines of the remarks of Nicolas Sarkozy, if it is not anguish, this anguish awaked by the teenagers themselves? The concept of ?juvenile delinquents? unfortunately comes to illustrate what the children and the teenagers of our suburbs for much of our political representatives are worth. In the usual situation, it is the role of the adults who to reassure the children and to bring back serenity in the hearths. It is legitimate to wonder about what the Minister of Interior Department could live itself during his own adolescence, to be thus terrorized by what in him these ?juvenile offenders awakes? and this ?rabble of suburbs?. It is probable that some impulse burned in its body on this occasion, some impulse whose it probably had certain difficulties in suppress ?fire?. If this fire came to be concretized for him in the form of ?migraines? which have it sometimes constrained, still recently, to cancel important appointments, it is not obliged to make some regulate the balance with these teenagers who found other ?voices? to make known their faintness only those that the adults responsible for our country spare for them.