[The-Lacanalyst] The more the merrier!

[Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA]

Hi Jacques,

Is there a way to consider the sender of the email also a recipient of the
same email (instead of being sent an automated confirmation response that
the sent email was received by the listserve?). In other words, instead of
being sent a received receipt for this email, I would simply see it as an
incoming listserv email. This could avoid the questions as to whether or
not an email went through and also would eliminate having to delete the
confirmation mail since no actual content is there (so extra step/task).

Just some ideas to consider as you search for the solution,
Kristopher

On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 6:50 AM Jacques B. Siboni via The-lacanalyst <
the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote:

> Robert your mail did reach us, I have to solve this lack of acknowledgment
>
> We can definitely increase the size of the list as it is a major problem
> in your
> country (and Germany and other countries)
>
> all the best
>
> Jacques
>
> On 9/29/25 4:48 PM, Aviva Euripides wrote:
> > Bonjour Scully Robert,
> > Oui to all.
> > I will make myself available to a time that works for you.  I am
> > inviting others with an ok from Jacques Siboni.
> > Aviva
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2025, 9:43 AM Tate via The-lacanalyst
> > <the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote:
> >
> >     Bonjour Aviva,
> >
> >     (I will assume that you and the group are receiving this email,
> >     while it is only myself that is not receiving a copy of the
> >     responses. I am also sending a CC duplicate to Jacques to make sure.)
> >
> >     Unfortunately, I  already have a meeting this week at this time on
> >     Thursday. Also, I would propose, if you and your colleagues find
> >     it appropriate, to invite a few others
> >     besides myself to attend, as this psychoanalysis title question in
> >     the US is recurrent. In any case, I can envisage some kind of
> >     meeting in the weeks to come to address this
> >     question. Please let me know if this email was received, possible
> >     meeting times, and if you are open to inviting others to
> >     listen/participate.
> >
> >     Best regards,
> >
> >     Scully Robert
> >
> >
> >
> >     > On Sep 29, 2025, at 6:54 AM, Aviva Euripides
> >     <euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote:
> >     >
> >     > Dear Scully-Robert,
> >     > We are meeting this Thursday at 7 am PDT.
> >     > Let me know if you would like the Zoom link.
> >     > Aviva
> >     >
> >     > On Sun, Sep 28, 2025, 11:35 PM Jacques B. Siboni via
> >     The-lacanalyst <the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote:
> >     > mail problem
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> >     > Subject:        test 123
> >     > Date:   Sun, 28 Sep 2025 17:44:53 -0700
> >     > From:   Tate <tate at netwood.net>
> >     > To:     Jacques Siboni <jacsib at lutecium.org>
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Hello Jacques,
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > I have pushed reply now twice to the emails from the Lutecium
> >     list in my
> >     > INBOX, and they do not seem to be getting through.
> >     >
> >     > Instead, it seems they are coming back to my address and CCing
> >     me also.
> >     > Do I need to push something besides reply?
> >     >
> >     > In any case, here are my previous two messages:
> >     >
> >     > Let me know,
> >     >
> >     > Scully-Robert
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > "Hello all,
> >     > Well, I sent out a previous email and it seems it did not go
> >     through ot
> >     > went to the wrong mailbox. Let me know if this goes through.
> >     > I will copy-paste what I had already sent:
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > << Bonjour Jacques and others,
> >     >
> >     > In this initial probe, I am sending out a brief post just to check
> >     > whether the email invitation works.
> >     > It was a pleasure to meet again in Paris for the homage to
> >     Jean-Michel.
> >     > The question of what is required to work under the title of
> >     > psychoanalyst should be gone through carefully, not mistaking,
> >     for example,
> >     > policy with statutory law, or psychoanalysis with psychoanalytic
> >     therapy.
> >     >
> >     > This much said, I am not so sure email is the right forum.
> >     > Let me know if this goes through, how, and when you would care to
> >     > address this.
> >     >
> >     > Truly,
> >     >
> >     > Scully-Robert Groome>>
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > --
> >     > The-lacanalyst mailing list
> >     > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> >     > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
> >     > --
> >     > The-lacanalyst mailing list
> >     > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> >     > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     The-lacanalyst mailing list
> >     The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> >     https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
> >
> >
>
> --
> The-lacanalyst mailing list
> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
>


-- 
Kristopher Lichtanski, PhD, LMHCA
*Psychotherapy. Coaching. Consultation.*
Serendipity Healing Arts Center, LLC
<https://www.serendipityhealingarts.com>
1.206.451.7020
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lutecium.org/pipermail/the-lacanalyst/attachments/20250930/154eecd2/attachment-0006.htm>