[The-Lacanalyst] The more the merrier!

[Aviva Euripides]

Oui the more the merrier
To clarify I am open to all time possibilities to include everyone
I just mean that if someone unfamiliar to us wants to join I myself will
defer to Jacques.
You can see below how I point to the specifics of my work at this time.
I do not work as a psychotherapist and have no interest in psychology-I do
operate under my license for financial reasons.
I am hopeful that the specification of Lutecium will gain some interest
towards our website, work and plus de jouir in general.
Next, I will make some Lutecium tee shirts and merch (merchandise), just
kidding!

*Aviva Euripides*
LMFT, Topologos Lutecium Domain
415-301-5219
avivaeuripides1 at gmail.com



On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 6:44 AM Jacques B. Siboni via The-lacanalyst <
the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote:

> Robert your mail did reach us, I have to solve this lack of acknowledgment
>
> We can definitely increase the size of the list as it is a major problem
> in your
> country (and Germany and other countries)
>
> all the best
>
> Jacques
>
> On 9/29/25 4:48 PM, Aviva Euripides wrote:
> > Bonjour Scully Robert,
> > Oui to all.
> > I will make myself available to a time that works for you.  I am
> > inviting others with an ok from Jacques Siboni.
> > Aviva
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2025, 9:43 AM Tate via The-lacanalyst
> > <the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote:
> >
> >     Bonjour Aviva,
> >
> >     (I will assume that you and the group are receiving this email,
> >     while it is only myself that is not receiving a copy of the
> >     responses. I am also sending a CC duplicate to Jacques to make sure.)
> >
> >     Unfortunately, I  already have a meeting this week at this time on
> >     Thursday. Also, I would propose, if you and your colleagues find
> >     it appropriate, to invite a few others
> >     besides myself to attend, as this psychoanalysis title question in
> >     the US is recurrent. In any case, I can envisage some kind of
> >     meeting in the weeks to come to address this
> >     question. Please let me know if this email was received, possible
> >     meeting times, and if you are open to inviting others to
> >     listen/participate.
> >
> >     Best regards,
> >
> >     Scully Robert
> >
> >
> >
> >     > On Sep 29, 2025, at 6:54 AM, Aviva Euripides
> >     <euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote:
> >     >
> >     > Dear Scully-Robert,
> >     > We are meeting this Thursday at 7 am PDT.
> >     > Let me know if you would like the Zoom link.
> >     > Aviva
> >     >
> >     > On Sun, Sep 28, 2025, 11:35 PM Jacques B. Siboni via
> >     The-lacanalyst <the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote:
> >     > mail problem
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> >     > Subject:        test 123
> >     > Date:   Sun, 28 Sep 2025 17:44:53 -0700
> >     > From:   Tate <tate at netwood.net>
> >     > To:     Jacques Siboni <jacsib at lutecium.org>
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Hello Jacques,
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > I have pushed reply now twice to the emails from the Lutecium
> >     list in my
> >     > INBOX, and they do not seem to be getting through.
> >     >
> >     > Instead, it seems they are coming back to my address and CCing
> >     me also.
> >     > Do I need to push something besides reply?
> >     >
> >     > In any case, here are my previous two messages:
> >     >
> >     > Let me know,
> >     >
> >     > Scully-Robert
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > "Hello all,
> >     > Well, I sent out a previous email and it seems it did not go
> >     through ot
> >     > went to the wrong mailbox. Let me know if this goes through.
> >     > I will copy-paste what I had already sent:
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > << Bonjour Jacques and others,
> >     >
> >     > In this initial probe, I am sending out a brief post just to check
> >     > whether the email invitation works.
> >     > It was a pleasure to meet again in Paris for the homage to
> >     Jean-Michel.
> >     > The question of what is required to work under the title of
> >     > psychoanalyst should be gone through carefully, not mistaking,
> >     for example,
> >     > policy with statutory law, or psychoanalysis with psychoanalytic
> >     therapy.
> >     >
> >     > This much said, I am not so sure email is the right forum.
> >     > Let me know if this goes through, how, and when you would care to
> >     > address this.
> >     >
> >     > Truly,
> >     >
> >     > Scully-Robert Groome>>
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > --
> >     > The-lacanalyst mailing list
> >     > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> >     > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
> >     > --
> >     > The-lacanalyst mailing list
> >     > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> >     > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     The-lacanalyst mailing list
> >     The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> >     https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
> >
> >
>
> --
> The-lacanalyst mailing list
> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lutecium.org/pipermail/the-lacanalyst/attachments/20250930/640e73bb/attachment-0006.htm>